A-191 How Does Teleneuropsychology Digit Span Measure Up?

Abstract Objective To see how strongly performance on a computerized visual digit span task correlates with non-computerized subtests. Method The data were chosen from de-identified database. Undiagnosed adult volunteers (n = 105) took the WAIS-IV Digit Span and TMB Demographic characteristics as follows: Age (M 28.5, SD 11.2), education 16.2, 1.9), gender (60% Female), race (69.8% White). A Pearson correlation was run longest forward (ldsf) backward (ldsb) raw scores of same individuals. Results suggest moderate between ldsf 7.14, 1.31) 6.90, 1.29) scores, r 0.45, p > 0.01. Moreover, results indicated ldsb 7.69, 1.43) 5.66, 1.81) 0.38, 73.1% participants had or within one both assessments, while 93% two digits. 63.8% 81.9% Conclusion Clinicians must note risk assuming tests measure cognitive functions standardized paper-and-pencil tests. These underscore this point. Future studies should continue to assess well in-person align other purporting abilities by examining variables (i.e., auditory vs. visual, controlled non-controlled environment).